add_header all DCC _DCCB_: _DCCR_
add_header all Pyzor_PYZOR_
HTH
Alan
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Carl
Chipman
Sent: 09 January 2004 04:45
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Header Rewrite
Is there a way to get SPAM
Is there a way to get SPAM Assassin to post the values each test contributed
to the total score in the header of the e-mail?
Our installation is still kinda new, and we are working out all of the
configurations bugs to get the false positive rate down.
We're using spamassassin.dll in Kerio's mail
Gary Funck writes:
> I noticed the same thing. Seems like this can be a bit of problem for
> those of us who would like to collect spam (and mis-classified ham) that
> that is later fed to sa-learn, or that is used to calibrate local scores
> via mass check. It is my understanding that the Bayes s
Question... Since I upgraded to 2.55, messages that have been marked as spam
and tossed into the spam folder are missing a lot of the path headers. For
example, below is the header of a busted message. Most of the path has been
truncated and only the 'localhost' remains. What would cause thi
handling library
routines.
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Miller
> Sent: Tuesday, August 05, 2003 7:31 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Header rewrite question
>
>
> Question... Since I upgraded to 2.55, messages that have been
> marked as spam
>
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0600, Mark Miller wrote:
> Question... Since I upgraded to 2.55, messages that have been marked as spam
> and tossed into the spam folder are missing a lot of the path headers. For
> example, below is the header of a busted message. Most of the path has been
Gary wrote, before completely checking the facts:
> I noticed the same thing [that Received headers
> were seemingly missing in spam that had been
> reported by SA].
Before writing that reply, I quickly looked at the beginning
of a big spam mbox that I've collected since last year. As
already
On Tue, Aug 05, 2003 at 08:31:16AM -0600, Mark Miller wrote:
> Question... Since I upgraded to 2.55, messages that have been marked as spam
> and tossed into the spam folder are missing a lot of the path headers. For
> example, below is the header of a busted message. Most of the path has been
