RE: [SAtalk] Heh, interesting spam

2004-01-28 Thread SpamTalk
Jonathan Nichols wrote: > A friend of mine got this spam and wanted to share: > > http://www.spiffariffic.com/homelandsec.txt > I got this from my brother in the FDIC yesterday: -Original Message- From: Chairman Powell's Office Sent: Friday, January 23, 2004 3:06 PM To: FDIC EMPLOYEES

[SAtalk] Heh, interesting spam

2004-01-28 Thread Jonathan Nichols
A friend of mine got this spam and wanted to share: http://www.spiffariffic.com/homelandsec.txt --- The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004 Premiere Conference on Open Tools Development and Integration See the breadth of Eclipse activ

Re: [SAtalk] HEh...

2004-01-15 Thread Charles Gregory
On Wed, 14 Jan 2004, Brian May wrote: > Thought this was a little humorous... Habeas is Misusing their own mark? I certainly hope Habeas isn't using some form of automated update for that infringer list/lookup. Otherwise I can see spammers abusing them further by submitting as many legitimate use

Re: [SAtalk] HEh... (habeas is listed in spamcop)

2004-01-15 Thread Dan Wilder
On Thu, Jan 15, 2004 at 12:09:36PM +0100, Cahya Wirawan wrote: > 64.142.16.37 (s2.habeas.com) is also listed in spamcop :) > http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&ip=64.142.16.37 > > cahya > > On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:01:03PM -0800, Brian May wrote: > > Thought this was a little humorous...

Re: [SAtalk] HEh... (habeas is listed in spamcop)

2004-01-15 Thread Cahya Wirawan
64.142.16.37 (s2.habeas.com) is also listed in spamcop :) http://www.spamcop.net/w3m?action=blcheck&ip=64.142.16.37 cahya On Wed, Jan 14, 2004 at 02:01:03PM -0800, Brian May wrote: > Thought this was a little humorous... Habeas is Misusing their own mark? > > Content analysis details: (8.0 poi

[SAtalk] HEh...

2004-01-14 Thread Brian May
Thought this was a little humorous... Habeas is Misusing their own mark? - Content preview: Thank you for your email to Habeas! This message has been automatically generated in response to your email regarding "Habeas Misuse", a summary of which appears below. There is no