RE: [SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments

2003-08-20 Thread Chris Santerre
> -Original Message- > From: Chris Trudeau-Personal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 9:29 PM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments > > > Hey all...I'm really interested...I was unable to

Re: [SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments

2003-08-20 Thread Chris Trudeau
; To: "'Chris Trudeau-Personal'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Wednesday, August 20, 2003 9:38 AM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments > > > > -Original Message- > > From: Chris Trudeau-Personal [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECT

Re: [SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments

2003-08-19 Thread Chris Trudeau-Personal
meta rule includingattachment detail...any ideas? CT - Original Message - From: "Chris Trudeau-Personal" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, August 19, 2003 7:08 AM Subject: [SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments > All, > > Is it safe to sa

[SAtalk] HEX IN URI and attachments

2003-08-19 Thread Chris Trudeau-Personal
All, Is it safe to say that no legitimate email would try and hide a URI in the body of a message by using the hex equivalent of the link? It seems to me that is the case. if so, I would like to write a rule that detects the use of this tactic. Also, is it possible for SA to detect attachments?