Miles Fidelman wrote:
MF> On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
MF>
MF> Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
Not yet -- there are some errors which crop up when invoking Razor from spamd --
we're working with the Razor guys to resolve the problem. We have a patch read
On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
**
The Center for Civic Networking PO Box 600618
Miles R. Fidelman, President & Newtonville, MA 0
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:51:37PM -0400, Duncan Findlay wrote:
> No. Integration was judged to be too unstable for us to release razor
> v2 support. I believe razor1 modules are still included with razor2.
The razor1 modules are not included in the razor-agents for v2. However,
if you had v1 in
Not fully judged that way yet -- still about 5 minutes until 2.30 is released!
C
Duncan Findlay wrote:
DF> On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:11:41PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
DF> > On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
DF> >
DF> > Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
DF>
On Fri, Jun 14, 2002 at 06:11:41PM -0400, Miles Fidelman wrote:
> On Sat, 15 Jun 2002, Simon Lyall wrote:
>
> Does the latest release of spamassassin support Razor v2 now?
>
No. Integration was judged to be too unstable for us to release razor
v2 support. I believe razor1 modules are still incl
On Fri, 14 Jun 2002, Matt Sergeant wrote:
> This all looks really quite interesting. Though I wonder if the load of
> all the extra work now being down will kill them... (especially without
> the server being released/available).
Are they intending to release the server at all? I was intending to
This all looks really quite interesting. Though I wonder if the load of
all the extra work now being down will kill them... (especially without
the server being released/available).
rODbegbie wrote:
>> 2 Nilsimsa Signatures
>>
>>Nilsimsa is a _fuzzy signature_ algorithm based on statistical
PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:55:07PM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> debug: Razor is available
> debug: Razor Agents 1.20, protocol version 2.
As I just posted (crossed in the ether), SA is using
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 12:55:07PM -0700, Jim Scott wrote:
> debug: Razor is available
> debug: Razor Agents 1.20, protocol version 2.
As I just posted (crossed in the ether), SA is using Razor v1 modules
which will still work. SA requires code changes for Razor v2 to
On Thu, Jun 13, 2002 at 03:28:39PM -0400, rODbegbie wrote:
> Initial signs are promising. Nothing seems "broken" in the SA integration.
> Coolio!
Warning: SA uses the Razor perl modules ... Razor v2 has the Razor2
perl modules, so you're not using the new Razor ...
I was just about to upgrade
- Original Message -
From: "rODbegbie" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 13, 2002 12:28 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Fw: [Razor-users] Announce: Vipul's Razor v2
rODbegbie wrote:
> Off to do a build now. I'll repor
rODbegbie wrote:
> Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later.
Initial signs are promising. Nothing seems "broken" in the SA integration.
Coolio!
rOD.
--
You have the right to remain *fabulous*
>> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ <<
Off to do a build now. I'll report back on how it does with SA later.
rOD.
--
I think I'm in love.
Probably just hungry.
>> Doing the blogging thang again at http://www.groovymother.com/ <<
- Original Message -
From: "Vipul Ved Prakash" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc:
13 matches
Mail list logo
