RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-15 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
L abilities.   m/ -Original Message-From: Dave Sheeran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Thursday, January 15, 2004 1:32 AMTo: Mitch (WebCob)Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!apologies the headers I sent was the ones received from SA. The h

Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-15 Thread Dave Sheeran
ECTED] Sent:Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:20 AM To: Mitch (WebCob) Cc:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject:Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook! Sorry, been out of the office for a couple of days. Here are hte headers To:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Return-Path:<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received:by pickering.co.uk (

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-14 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Message-From: Dave Sheeran [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]Sent: Wednesday, January 14, 2004 3:20 AMTo: Mitch (WebCob)Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!Sorry, been out of the office for a couple of days. Here are hte headersTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Re: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-14 Thread Dave Sheeran
lem can be fixed... the rule needs an update, but no one is submitting the information. m/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Michael P. Varre Sent: Monday, January 12, 2004 11:01 AM To: Dave Sheeran; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] For

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-13 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook! This happens with all Outlook 2003 installs from what I've seen. Just a discrepancy I suppose with the rules and the way Outlook 2003 differs from previous versions... Not sure what the fix is though, hasn't bothered

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-13 Thread Michael P. Varre
ran Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 9:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook! Hi Folks I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-11 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook! Hi Folks I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook

[SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-11 Thread David Sheeran
Hi Folks I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't Any ideas? Dav

RE: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-10 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
Never seen that - post some headers?!? If someone can confirm it, submit a bug report. m/ -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Behalf Of Dave Sheeran Sent: Friday, January 09, 2004 6:52 AM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Forged Outlook from

[SAtalk] Forged Outlook from Outlook!

2004-01-09 Thread Dave Sheeran
Hi Folks I'm getting emails caught by SA 1.61 on the following rules. Not sure why as I sent it myself from MS Office Outlook 2003 (11.5608.5606) 3.3 FORGED_MUA_OUTLOOK Forged mail pretending to be from MS Outlook 0.9 MISSING_OUTLOOK_NAME Message looks like Outlook, but isn't Any ideas? Dav