RE: [SAtalk] False positive on MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR

2004-01-05 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
ilto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Monday, January 05, 2004 12:44 PM To: "Mitch (WebCob)" Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] False positive on MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR At Mon Jan 5 18:42:45 2004, "Mitch \(WebCob\)" wrote: > > /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf:uri MAILTO_T

Re: [SAtalk] False positive on MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR

2004-01-05 Thread Martin Radford
At Mon Jan 5 18:42:45 2004, "Mitch \(WebCob\)" wrote: > > /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf:uri MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR > /^mailto:[a-z]+\d{2,}\@/is > /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf:describe MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR > Includes a link to a likely spammer email > > The way I read this test (

[SAtalk] False positive on MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR

2004-01-05 Thread Mitch \(WebCob\)
/usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf:uri MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR /^mailto:[a-z]+\d{2,}\@/is /usr/share/spamassassin/20_uri_tests.cf:describe MAILTO_TO_SPAM_ADDR Includes a link to a likely spammer email The way I read this test (and I may be wrong here) is that an HTML or other message containing m