Title: FROM_AND_TO_SAME Rule does not seem to work
Derek Jennings [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Most of the few spams that make it to my inbox are from
> "some_name" [...]
I've been having pretty good luck with a meta-rule that compares addresses in "From:" with the IP address in "Received:"
On Tue, Nov 11, 2003 at 01:13:27PM -0800, Morris Jones wrote:
> I think I solved this problem by removing my email address from the
> AWL. No need for it to be in there.
>
> spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
The developers are still pondering it, however for me, the pat
I think I solved this problem by removing my email address from the
AWL. No need for it to be in there.
spamassassin --remove-addr-from-whitelist [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Mojo
On Sun, 9 Nov 2003, Derek Jennings wrote:
>
> I have upgraded to 2.60 because this was driving me crazy in 2.55, but the
>
--On Sunday, November 09, 2003 12:01 AM + Derek Jennings
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
These trigger the AWL test and come in with a low score, and are not
detected by the FROM_AND_TO_SAME test which ought to find them.
That test looks like it compares the entire From and To line, not just the
I have upgraded to 2.60 because this was driving me crazy in 2.55, but the
problem seems to be still there.
Most of the few spams that make it to my inbox are from
"some_name"
These trigger the AWL test and come in with a low score, and are not
detected by the FROM_AND_TO_SAME test which ought
