subject:"\[SAtalk\] FP and suggestion for new rule."

Re: [SAtalk] FP and suggestion for new rule.

2002-11-26 Thread Justin Mason

Jon Gabrielson said: > I received a FP today that had the following header: > > X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.20] > X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for > spam. > > I have also noticed other "commercial" filters in headers before. > Would a

[SAtalk] FP and suggestion for new rule.

2002-11-25 Thread Jon Gabrielson

I received a FP today that had the following header: X-Declude-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [192.168.1.20] X-Note: This E-mail was scanned by Declude JunkMail (www.declude.com) for spam. I have also noticed other "commercial" filters in headers before. Would adding a rule that gives a few positive