Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_AOL and AOL employees

2003-06-28 Thread Martin Radford
At Sat Jun 28 00:40:16 2003, Matt Kettler wrote: > > The FORGED_MUA_AOL rules are written to try to recognize mail that claims > to be "from" an aol.com address, but doesn't appear to have been actualy > relayed through a mailserver with an aol-ish name. No. FORGED_MUA_AOL simply checks that i

Re: [SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_AOL and AOL employees

2003-06-27 Thread Matt Kettler
At 04:57 PM 6/27/2003 -0600, Bryan Field-Elliot wrote: I've been exchanging mail with an actual employee of AOL, and his messages are always tagged as spam because they fail the FORGED_MUA_AOL filter. Obviously, he's a little upset about this! Is there something he could be doing differently, or

[SAtalk] FORGED_MUA_AOL and AOL employees

2003-06-27 Thread Bryan Field-Elliot
I've been exchanging mail with an actual employee of AOL, and his messages are always tagged as spam because they fail the FORGED_MUA_AOL filter. Obviously, he's a little upset about this! Is there something he could be doing differently, or is SpamAssassin simply not going to discern between F