Bill Polhemus wrote:
This one got through. Can we figure out how and why?
With just the body of the message and no headers, probably not. That
really not enough to work with.
---
This SF.net email sponsored by: Enterprise Linux Forum Conf
This one got through. Can we figure out how and why?
Notice purposeful misspellings as obfuscations.
William L. Polhemus, Jr. P.E.
Polhemus Engineering Company
Katy, Texas USA
-Begin Included Message-
16121g11n4m06a8a53594548b10126vx
291uqs7rz3xo63jl8w5ie14f3q3c3770The stoicism which
she
Dominik Ruf writes:
> * Lewis Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-17 22:41]:
> > I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the
> > logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip
> > address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is inc
* Lewis Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2003-10-17 22:41]:
> I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the
> logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip
> address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is incorrect but
> I doubt that aol
I see messages receiving points for FAKE_HELO_AOL yet when I look in the
logs the SMTP server that sent the message is indeed listed in as an ip
address as an AOL mail server. I think that the helo name is incorrect but
I doubt that aol is going to fix this. How can I fix this to where it
works cor
I am watching the log file of a new 2.60 upgrade go past my log file
viewer and I'm seeing some messages get caught as spam because they are
from AOL. These are known accounts with my company and we have received
many messages in the past that were not flagged as spam. Since the 2.6
install they
