Hi Mark,
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:46 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
>
>
>
>
> Do you really think it would be a problem if we found m
Thanks Jennifer! I should have know you would be on top of this.
--Larry
> -Original Message-
> From: Jennifer Wheeler
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 11:11 AM
> To: 'Larry Gilson'; 'Mark Ritchie';
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: RE: [SAtalk]
>
> On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Mark Ritchie wrote:
> > Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is
> the and
> > tags. Would it be possible to make a rule or adjust
> the rules so
> > the scores high? There is nothing inbetween and I'd have to
> > say anyone sending messages like
Perhaps it's time
for a new set. That would be an easy technique to stop them from using
lest they get tagged. When I get some time, I'll play around.
Jennifer
> -Original Message-
> From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 A
On Wed, 29 Oct 2003, Mark Ritchie wrote:
> Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is the and
> tags. Would it be possible to make a rule or adjust the rules so
> the scores high? There is nothing inbetween and I'd have to
> say anyone sending messages like this is obviously a
>
> Do you really think it would be a problem if we found more
> than 3 instances of in each email to mark it as spam?
> Maybe I could just score it lower per instance, say .2
>
> There were 58 instances of in this email and 63
> instances of .
>
A test that counted .1 per instance in a me
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Mark
Ritchie
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 7:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
I've added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but
I did find a single test in 20_head_tests.cf called TO_ADDRESS_EQ_REAL that
uses backreferences in this way, so I'm presuming it works.
-- Scott
-Original Message-
From: Mark Ritchie [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 8:14 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Wednesday, October 29, 2003 9:35 AM
To: Mark Ritchie; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
Yes, this would be possible.
describe MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAGMY: Excessive HTML Tags
rawbody MY_RBDY_EXSV_TAG/<[bi]><\/[bi]>/i
scoreMY_RBDY_EXS
IL PROTECTED]
Subject: [SAtalk] Exessive HTML Code
I've added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but I've
noticed that I'm still getting quite a few spams messages per day. It
always seems to be the most offensive porn and such that makes it through.
Here is an
Mark Ritchie <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Now, as you can see the trick here to fool spamassassin is the
> and tags.
I don't think that's what's fooling SA. SA strips all that
stuff out before looking for phrases. The problem is the lack
of phrases to trigger on.
> Would it be possible to
I've
added the popcorn, blackhair, and weeds rules a while back, but I've noticed
that I'm still getting quite a few spams messages per day. It always seems
to be the most offensive porn and such that makes it
through.
Here
is an example of the source that get's through
NOT mature,
12 matches
Mail list logo
