Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5

2003-09-22 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > About $PATH: >> From the spamd start script: > PATH=$PATH:/usr/bin:/usr/local/bin What's the _full_ PATH variable? Telling me that /usr/bin and /usr/local/bin were appended to PATH does not answer the question. > And you're right, Daniel, in the

Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5

2003-09-22 Thread Daniel Quinlan
=?iso-8859-1?B?THVpcyBIZXJu4W4gT3RlZ3Vp?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Well, I guess nobody noticed my other post, so here we go again: > Since upgrading to SA-2.60-RC5, I'm getting this warnings in the maillog > whenever spamd analizes a message: > Sep 22 10:39:00 nahuel spamd[16955]: DCC -> ch

Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5

2003-09-22 Thread Luis Hernán Otegui
h You..." From: Daniel Quinlan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: Luis Hernán Otegui <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5 Date: 22 Sep 2003 10:28:33 -0700 =?iso-8859-1?B?THVpcyBIZXJu4W4gT3RlZ3Vp?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&

[SAtalk] Error message from DCC since upgraded to RC5

2003-09-22 Thread Luis Hernán Otegui
Well, I guess nobody noticed my other post, so here we go again: Since upgrading to SA-2.60-RC5, I'm getting this warnings in the maillog whenever spamd analizes a message: Sep 22 10:39:00 nahuel spamd[16955]: DCC -> check failed: Insecure directory in $ENV{PATH} while running with -T switch at