Re: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-17 Thread guenther
> > > http://www.wot.no-ip.com/cgi-bin/detoken.pl > > > > > > Most of the gibberish I see is encoded tracking information. I plugged > > > in my domain name to the little script thingy, saved the .cf file, and > > > it catches 'em like crazy. > > > > I've added a link for this to the front page

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-17 Thread stan
On Wed, Dec 17, 2003 at 10:05:41AM -0500, AltGrendel wrote: > On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:17, Tom Meunier wrote: > > http://www.wot.no-ip.com/cgi-bin/detoken.pl > > > > Most of the gibberish I see is encoded tracking information. I plugged > > in my domain name to the little script thingy, saved the

RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-17 Thread AltGrendel
On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 11:17, Tom Meunier wrote: > http://www.wot.no-ip.com/cgi-bin/detoken.pl > > Most of the gibberish I see is encoded tracking information. I plugged > in my domain name to the little script thingy, saved the .cf file, and > it catches 'em like crazy. > I've added a link for

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-12 Thread Lucas Albers
Archive of this: http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?t=10613675441&r=1&w=2 Analyze letter frequency for normal words, and detect non-normal letter frequency of gibberish. --luke > I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lines of gibberish, > such as: > > lvwpdfobv qkviylqr qlm

RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-12 Thread Erick Calder
] > [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Larry Starr > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish > > I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lines > of gibberish, such as: > >

Re: detoken (was: RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish)

2003-12-11 Thread guenther
FYI: Solved. > This is the only rule that failes for me: > > rawbody W_B64_HALL =~ /Z3VlbnRoZXJAcnVkZXJzcG9ydC5kZQ/ > describe W_B64_H Listwashing token found in head - Base64 > score W_B64_H 1.0 I just have been informed that this little bug has been fixed. The rule should read: hea

Re: detoken (was: RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish)

2003-12-11 Thread guenther
[ Cc: to the detoken rules maintainer ] > However, seems there are issues with the full-address detoken rules and > SA 2.61 (using Perl v5.8.0). Any ideas? > > # spamassassin --lint > Failed to compile body SpamAssassin tests, skipping: > (Bareword "ALL" not allowed while "strict subs" in

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-11 Thread Chris Thielen
Bill Landry said: > Hmmm, Jennifer was hosting her excellent rules at > http://spamhammers.nxtek.net, but the site appears to be inaccessible > right > now. You can also fine them at Jennifer moved her rulesets to: http://www.emtinc.net/spamhammers.htm -- Chris Thielen Easily generate SpamAss

detoken (was: RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish)

2003-12-11 Thread guenther
[ Cc: to the detoken rules maintainer ] On Thu, 2003-12-11 at 17:17, Tom Meunier wrote: > http://www.wot.no-ip.com/cgi-bin/detoken.pl > > Most of the gibberish I see is encoded tracking information. I plugged > in my domain name to the little script thingy, saved the .cf file, and > it catches '

Re: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-11 Thread Bill Landry
set also. Bill - Original Message - From: "Larry Starr" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 7:49 AM Subject: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish > > I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lin

RE: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-11 Thread Tom Meunier
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On > Behalf Of Larry Starr > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2003 9:50 AM > To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish > > I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lines > of gibberish, such as: > >

[SAtalk] Detecting strings of Gibberish

2003-12-11 Thread Larry Starr
I have noticed that many SPAM emails, end with seversl lines of gibberish, such as: lvwpdfobv qkviylqr qlmwacbc hpimhdty mdmrkb lvivhdc xovwul wpcxeqj lhaxomaje vrucjj ybxegs Has anyone developed a rule that can detect this sort of thing? Perhaps a check for consecuti