AW: [SAtalk] Confused about sa-learn and auto_learn

2003-06-16 Thread Martin Bene
Hi Bryan > Given that auto_learn is working, is it still worthwhile to > run true-positives (spam) and true-negatives (hams) through > sa-learn, as the INSTALL document says you should do? Yes, it makes sense: auto-earn is quite conservative wrt to the messages it actually trains from. This mea

[SAtalk] Confused about sa-learn and auto_learn

2003-06-16 Thread Bryan Field-Elliot
I'm a little confused about training with sa-learn, when auto_learn is enabled by default. Given that auto_learn is working, is it still worthwhile to run true-positives (spam) and true-negatives (hams) through sa-learn, as the INSTALL document says you should do? Or instead is it only us