Re: [SAtalk] Bayes_99 causing many false positives.

2003-12-30 Thread David A . Roth
On Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Simon Byrnand wrote: I upgraded from 2.60 to 2.61 and I am getting many false positives. It seems that Bayes is pushing it with a score of 5.4. What are people to do to get around this? Do you set Bayes for a lower score? Do you disable? Thanks! 5.4 BAYE

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes_99 causing many false positives.

2003-12-28 Thread Simon Byrnand
At 15:11 28/12/2003 -0500, David A. Roth wrote: On Sunday, December 28, 2003, at 01:40 PM, Simon Byrnand wrote: I upgraded from 2.60 to 2.61 and I am getting many false positives. It seems that Bayes is pushing it with a score of 5.4. What are people to do to get around this? Do you set Bayes fo

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes_99 causing many false positives.

2003-12-28 Thread Simon Byrnand
> I upgraded from 2.60 to 2.61 and I am getting many false positives. It > seems that Bayes is pushing it with a score of 5.4. What are people to > do to get around this? Do you set Bayes for a lower score? Do you > disable? Thanks! > > 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is

[SAtalk] Bayes_99 causing many false positives.

2003-12-28 Thread David A . Roth
I upgraded from 2.60 to 2.61 and I am getting many false positives. It seems that Bayes is pushing it with a score of 5.4. What are people to do to get around this? Do you set Bayes for a lower score? Do you disable? Thanks! 5.4 BAYES_99 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 99 to 10