Robin Whittle <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have not seen any headers so far with BAYES_40, BAYES_44, BAYES_50, or
BAYES_56. Is this because they are all score 0.001?
In SA 2.54, they're scored at 0, not 0.001. Have you already changed the
scores?
Assuming they're at 0, then yes, this is the rea
Tom Meunier wrote:
> I'd say 98.4% accuracy is pretty darned good, Robin.
I agree - this is excellent! With version 1.42 I was getting around 85%.
> hold off a little, take the missed spam and send it through sa-learn.
I don't think that adding four messages to what the Bayes system has
lear
I'd say 98.4% accuracy is pretty darned good, Robin. Hold off a little,
take the missed spam and send it through sa-learn. I don't know where
you got the corpus of spam and ham from, but as you send current traffic
through sa-learn, rather than a slightly stale corpus, or a corpus from
another us
I have installed SA 2.55 and trained the Bayes system on about 1900
spams and about 1900 good emails. I have RBL checks enabled too. So
far, it has been a great success! 259 spams were correctly identified
in the first week, and four missed. (This is for one mail account.)
Two of the false neg
