[SAtalk] Bayes scoring

2004-01-31 Thread Kareem Dana
Hello, I use spamassassin 2.54 and just turned on bayesian filtering. I saved over 1000 recent spams and hams and trained the filter on those emails. However, when an email is scored with BAYES_99 it is only get a 3.0 from that hit. I know I can maunally change the score of BAYES_99 but I'm wond

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes scoring

2004-01-31 Thread Martin Radford
At Fri Jan 30 22:33:27 2004, Kareem Dana wrote: > > Hello, > > I use spamassassin 2.54 and just turned on bayesian filtering. I saved > over 1000 recent spams and hams and trained the filter on those emails. Well, you really ought to be using a later version than 2.54. The current version is 2

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes scoring

2003-12-07 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:46 PM 12/7/03 -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote: 50_scores.cf:score BAYES_80 0 0 5.300 2.862 50_scores.cf:score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 3.002 50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 3.008 if I'm reading this correctly more points are given for classifying a message as 80% probable than for 90% probab

Re: [SAtalk] Bayes scoring

2003-12-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Sun, Dec 07, 2003 at 02:46:39PM -0600, Michael Satterwhite wrote: > Can some of you experts explain this one to me? http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq01.005.htp -- Randomly Generated Tagline: "The highest patriotism is not a blind acceptance of official policy, but

[SAtalk] Bayes scoring

2003-12-07 Thread Michael Satterwhite
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm looking at the standard scoring of the BAYES rules and I see 50_scores.cf:score BAYES_80 0 0 5.300 2.862 50_scores.cf:score BAYES_90 0 0 4.027 3.002 50_scores.cf:score BAYES_99 0 0 5.200 3.008 if I'm reading this correctly more points are given f