Tom Meunier wrote:
>
Even on good mail?
Duh! Sorry for that half-baed description. Spams are marked 99%. It is
not falsely classifying good messages. Actually, I saw two 90% scores today.
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer re
At 08:36 AM 10/22/2003, Scott Rothgaber wrote:
My Bayes database finally got its 200 spams and hams and kicked in. I've
noticed, however, that it *always* says that the probability is 99%. Is
this normal?
No.. It is however quite normal for nearly all spams to be at 99% and
nearly all nonspam to
nal Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On
> Behalf Of Scott Rothgaber
> Sent: Wednesday, October 22, 2003 7:37 AM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: [SAtalk] Bayes always 99%
>
> My Bayes database finally got its 200 spams and hams and
>
My Bayes database finally got its 200 spams and hams and kicked in. I've
noticed, however, that it *always* says that the probability is 99%. Is
this normal?
Thanks!
Scott
---
This SF.net email is sponsored by OSDN developer relations
Here's
