Re: [SAtalk] Backhair FP

2004-01-31 Thread Matthew Trent
On Friday 30 January 2004 11:17 am, Jennifer Wheeler wrote: > My bad. I just posted a change to body rule with the set, but it has to > be rawbody. I realized this as soon as I hit send. (oops) Now... I > don’t know if rawbody looks at the headers... ?? If that doesn't fix > it, I wouldn't kno

Re: [SAtalk] Backhair FP

2004-01-30 Thread Matthew Trent
On Friday 30 January 2004 11:19 am, Brent J. Nordquist wrote: > Yup; my X-Face triggers one chickenpox. If you only get one I don't think > that's a biggie. No, but IMHO it should be as accurate as possible... -- Matt Systems Administrator Local Access Communications 360.330.5535 -

RE: [SAtalk] Backhair FP

2004-01-30 Thread Jennifer Wheeler
My bad. I just posted a change to body rule with the set, but it has to be rawbody. I realized this as soon as I hit send. (oops) Now... I don’t know if rawbody looks at the headers... ?? If that doesn't fix it, I wouldn't know how to miss that. Maybe someone else will know. Jennifer > > Lo

RE: [SAtalk] Backhair FP

2004-01-30 Thread Jennifer Wheeler
Hi Matthew, > > Looks like Backhair is triggering on my X-Face header. At least that's the > only thing I can see that might be it. See the following email (BH == > BackHair): I changed the rule from full to body. Could you dl and test the current set to see if it misses now? It should, being t

[SAtalk] Backhair FP

2004-01-30 Thread Matthew Trent
Looks like Backhair is triggering on my X-Face header. At least that's the only thing I can see that might be it. See the following email (BH == BackHair): -- Begin Return-path: Envelope-to: xxx Delivery-date: Fri, 30 Jan 2004 09:42:49 -0800 Received: from alderaan.localaccess.com (