Re: [SAtalk] Auto Whitelist strangeness

2003-07-08 Thread Thomas Cameron
CTED]> To: "Thomas Cameron" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, July 08, 2003 11:00 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Auto Whitelist strangeness > > This is a very common misunderstanding, which results from a general la

Re: [SAtalk] Auto Whitelist strangeness

2003-07-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:48 AM 7/8/2003 -0500, Thomas Cameron wrote: I just got a spam which scored 13.80 but had a -4.8 point AWL adjustment. I don't understand how it could have been whitelisted because it is obviously porn spam. It even rates a BAYES_70. How is it possible that it was whitelisted? This is a ver

[SAtalk] Auto Whitelist strangeness

2003-07-07 Thread Thomas Cameron
I just got a spam which scored 13.80 but had a -4.8 point AWL adjustment. I don't understand how it could have been whitelisted because it is obviously porn spam. It even rates a BAYES_70. How is it possible that it was whitelisted? I can post the message source if it is appropriate to do so. -