Re: [SAtalk] Auto-learn bug

2004-01-01 Thread Martin Radford
At Thu Jan 1 02:09:41 2004, Theo Van Dinter wrote: > Well, Bayes says it's 100% spam, which doesn't count towards autolearn > decisions.As the debug output says, the original score (scoreset > 3, with no learn or userconf rules applied), the message scores 0.1 > (HTML_MESSAGE). In scoreset 1

Re: [SAtalk] Auto-learn bug

2003-12-31 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Wed, Dec 31, 2003 at 03:39:12PM +0100, Csaba Kiss wrote: > debug: auto-learn: currently using scoreset 3. recomputing score based > on scoreset 1. > debug: Score set 1 chosen. > debug: auto-learn: original score: 0.1, recomputed score: 0.001 > debug: Score set 3 chosen. > debug: auto-learn? ye

[SAtalk] Auto-learn bug

2003-12-31 Thread Csaba Kiss
Hi! Recently my spamassassin autolearn feature went bonkers. I have problems with the auto-ham learn. I paste here a part of the spamassassin -D output: "[...] debug: bayes: score = 1 [...] debug: running meta tests; score so far=0.1 debug: auto-learn? ham=0.1, spam=7, body-hits=0.1, head-hits=0