RE: [SAtalk] Attachments vs the 2.4 way of doing it

2003-03-21 Thread Michael Moncur
> Explanation: some spammers strip the string "nospam" from address lists, > assuming that folks often disguise addresses like so > > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This is why I've posted to USENET using the (valid) email address [EMAIL PROTECTED] for years - presumably when the 'nospam' is st

Re: [SAtalk] Attachments vs the 2.4 way of doing it

2003-03-19 Thread Malte S. Stretz
On Wednesday 19 March 2003 18:01 CET Steve Prior wrote: > I recently upgraded from 2.4.something to 2.5. I have found that I > miss a great deal the fact that 2.4.* used to alter the message body > when it found spam. [...] We'll release 2.51 tomorrow which has a workaround for this. If you can'