On Sunday 03 March 2002 07:54 am, Rob McMillin wrote:
> You made the same spelling error twice in the original.
Gah! I really must use my spellchecker more often.
--
Visit http://dmoz.org, the world's | Give a man a match, and he'll be warm
largest human edited web directory. | for a minut
Matthew Cline wrote:
>On Saturday 02 March 2002 09:37 pm, I wrote:
>
>>rawbody ONLY_ATTACHMENTS eval:check_for_only_attachments()
>>describe ONLY_ATTACHMNETS Only attachmnets, no text
>>
>
>Ooops, spelling mistake in "describe". Should be
>
>describe ONLY_ATTACHMENTS Only atta
On Saturday 02 March 2002 09:37 pm, I wrote:
> rawbody ONLY_ATTACHMENTS eval:check_for_only_attachments()
> describe ONLY_ATTACHMNETS Only attachmnets, no text
Ooops, spelling mistake in "describe". Should be
describe ONLY_ATTACHMENTS Only attachmnets, no text
> sub check_
I've gotten lots of spam that's only an attachment. To detect this, I've
written two rawbody eval subroutines. One checks if the first part of a
multi-part mail has any non-blank lines, and if it has none, it returns true;
this is supposed to detect messages that are soley attachments with no
