1. There is a procmail mailing list, where questions like this are
discussed. Warning: although not as cranky as the sendmail list,
this group will encourage you to RTFM before posting your question.
see http://mailman.rwth-aachen.de/mailman/listinfo/procmail for
details.
2. Given tha
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003, mairhtin wrote:
> procmail: Extraneous locallockfile ignored
That's coming from this line:
> :0:
The trailing colon means to use a lockfile, but your action (i.e., nested
recipes enclosed in braces) doesn't provide procmail with a filename that
it can use as the basis for a
On Sat, 29 Nov 2003 19:54:13 + (GMT), Martin Radford wrote:
>
>According to the procmailrc man page, you can log anything you want to
>the procmail log file by assigning it to the LOG variable.
>
>You should be able to use the "formail" command to extract the To:
>header.
>
>So, it *looks* l
> People can be blunt on Usenet. But procmail is not sendmail, so it's
> hardly surprising they suggested you go elsewhere. The same would
> happen here if you started posting questions about some other
> anti-spam software (except we might be more polite than if this were
> usenet :-)
Very nice
At Sat Nov 29 18:17:38 2003, mairhtin wrote:
>
> Hello,
>
> I am having a devil of a time trying to find out how to add to the
> procmail.log.
>
> What I want is to have the To: listed in the log, along with the
> From and Subject. Currently, the From:, Subject:, and the
> destination folder ar
Hello,
I am having a devil of a time trying to find out how to add to the procmail.log.
What I want is to have the To: listed in the log, along with the From and Subject.
Currently, the From:, Subject:, and the
destination folder are shown as below :
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Nov 29 10:12:
