Re: [SAtalk] All HTML Spam Through PART DEUX

2002-07-25 Thread Justin Mason
"Stewart, John" said: > Shouldn't a spam with web bugs be a big tipoff? It's got this in the body: > http://track.offer888.net/cgi-bin/trimlife?e=2651380.17";> > But this seems to have made it *less* of a spam? problem is, this is quite a common trick used by the legit mailshot companies, so th

[SAtalk] All HTML Spam Through PART THREE

2002-07-25 Thread Stewart, John
(good lord, I'm so dumb forgot to attach) (Note to self: never post before you have your morning caffeine) Kind of in the vein of the all-graphics spam, this guy got through this morning. It only scored a 1.3: SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- SPA

[SAtalk] All HTML Spam Through PART DEUX

2002-07-25 Thread Stewart, John
(aaach - my apologies... Outlook decided I wanted to send it before I finished composing) Kind of in the vein of the all-graphics spam, this guy got through this morning. It only scored a 1.3: SPAM: Start SpamAssassin results -- SPAM: This mail is probab

[SAtalk] All HTML Spam Through

2002-07-25 Thread Stewart, John
Kind of in the vein of the all-graphics spam, this guy got through this morning. It only scored a 1.3: --- This sf.net email is sponsored by: Jabber - The world's fastest growing real-time communications platform! Don't just IM. Build it in!