-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kai
MacTane
Sent: Wednesday, November 19, 2003 12:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
At 11/19/03 10:42 AM , Steve Thomas wrote:
>I read
At 11/19/03 10:42 AM , Steve Thomas wrote:
I read this on TheRegister.com yesterday. The only reasonal explaination
is that they wanted to make sure that the concept was never put into
practice and they never really intended to use the technique themselves. I
hope...
Well, the article does stat
On Wed, 19 Nov 2003, Martin McWhorter wrote:
> >filters." AT&T says it is re-evaluating the patent and has not decided how
> >it will use the technology.
> >SOURCE: News.com; AUTHOR: Paul Festa, CNET
> >http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5108918.html
> Here is a suggestion: Sue spammers that use techn
On Wed, Nov 19, 2003 at 10:12:51AM -0800, Harold Hallikainen is rumored to have said:
>
> AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
> ...
I read this on TheRegister.com yesterday. The only reasonal explaination is that they
wanted to make sure that the concept was never put into practice and they ne
filters." AT&T says it is re-evaluating the patent and has not decided how
it will use the technology.
SOURCE: News.com; AUTHOR: Paul Festa, CNET
http://news.com.com/2100-1032_3-5108918.html
Here is a suggestion: Sue spammers that use technology to bypass filters
for patent infringement.
--
AT&T PATENTS ANTI-ANTISPAM TECHNOLOGY
Critics ponder why AT&T would patent a technology that thwarts antispam
filters. The technology operates as a "system and method for counteracting
message filtering," according to its patent awarded on Nov 4. "Why is
AT&T
inventing and patenting a method for e
