Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-27 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Alton Yu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Now even more weird. I just installed it on a Solaris 8 box and no > problems. > > Are you guys sure it's the bug? If you're running Perl 5.005, then SA will not use taint-mode since Perl 5.005 is so hopelessly old. Therefore, the taint-mode problems in R

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-27 Thread Alton Yu
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel > Quinlan > Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:09 PM > To: Theo Van Dinter > Cc: Daniel Quinlan; Ben Goodwin; Darren Coleman; > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped > > > Theo Van Dinter <[E

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-25 Thread shock_mailing_lists
:) -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Daniel Quinlan Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 2003 7:09 PM To: Theo Van Dinter Cc: Daniel Quinlan; Ben Goodwin; Darren Coleman; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped Theo

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 06:49:52PM -0700, Dan Quinlan wrote: > should also print out an install-time warning and stuff all of the major > documentation files into /usr/share/doc/spamassassin if it doesn't > already. I'm not optimistic, though. The ones that are installed now in the RPM btw: Chan

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Ben Goodwin wrote: >> OK, I see the reference to the patch, but the RPMS don't include it :-\ Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > They do in the tarball. But it's not a doc or a tool, or part of the > actual code ... It's in the INSTALL, the README, the announcement, and the Razor2.

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Daniel Quinlan
Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > The ones that are installed now in the RPM btw: > > Changes INSTALL README README.spamd sample-nonspam.txt sample-spam.txt I'd also include: BUGS COPYRIGHT License TRADEMARK USAGE Razor2.patch > yeah, now that I've changed it. the

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Sep 23, 2003 at 03:48:15PM -0400, Ben Goodwin wrote: > OK, I see the reference to the patch, but the RPMS don't include it :-\ They do in the tarball. But it's not a doc or a tool, or part of the actual code ... > The README says until at least 2.36 implying 2.36 fixes it, but the patch

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Ben Goodwin
g 2.36 fixes it, but the patch says otherwise. Off to patch my installation. Thanks! -=| Ben - Original Message - From: "Darren Coleman" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Ben Goodwin" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Tuesday, September 23, 20

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Darren Coleman
; To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: [SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped > > > I've searched and found similar issues but nothing that helps > me out. I'm > getting this since upgrading from 2.55 to 2.60: > > Sep 23 07:06:20 rs spamd[1936]: razor2 check skipped: B

[SAtalk] 2.60 upgrade: razor2 check skipped

2003-09-23 Thread Ben Goodwin
I've searched and found similar issues but nothing that helps me out. I'm getting this since upgrading from 2.55 to 2.60: Sep 23 07:06:20 rs spamd[1936]: razor2 check skipped: Bad file descriptor Insecure dependency in connect while running with -T switch at /usr/lib/perl5/5.6.1/i386-linux/IO/Soc