RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 02:22 PM 10/8/2003, Rob Mangiafico wrote: So, with SA 2.6x and having an autolearn bayes db per user setup, is the journal method recommended, or is it not needed in such a setup? Just trying to figure out the best configuration for per user bayes autolearning. To be honest with you, I can't hel

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Rob Mangiafico
> >So this means we cannot run multiple sessions? > > > >I'm running SA 2.6 spamd/spamc, and getting this same error log. > Not without error messages... however, as Theo very correctly pointed out > the errors aren't fatal, it just means that an attempt at autolearning > failed. SA itself keeps

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Bruce, Rob
Upgrading our copy of Mailscanner fixed this. Rob -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Jeffrey Wheat Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 3:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors I haven't found a real answer i

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Matt Kettler
At 12:50 AM 10/8/2003, Diego Weinstein wrote: So this means we cannot run multiple sessions? I'm running SA 2.6 spamd/spamc, and getting this same error log. I'm receiving about 2 mail connections to the mta per second, so I have sometimes about 20 spamd processes running, that's my top because I

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Diego Weinstein
Thanks, this helped a lot. -Original Message- From: Kai Risku [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: MiƩrcoles, 08 de Octubre de 2003 05:17 a.m. To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Cc: Diego Weinstein Subject: RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors Enabling the Bayes journal should help ("bayes_learn_to_jour

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Jeffrey Wheat
ubject: RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors So this means we cannot run multiple sessions? I'm running SA 2.6 spamd/spamc, and getting this same error log. I'm receiving about 2 mail connections to the mta per second, so I have sometimes about 20 spamd processes running, that's my top b

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-08 Thread Kai Risku
0-767 8282 Oy Arrak Software Ab http://www.arrak.fi > -Original Message- > From: Diego Weinstein [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Posted At: Wednesday, October 08, 2003 7:51 AM > Posted To: SpamAssassin-talk > Conversation: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors > Subject: RE: [SAtalk]

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-07 Thread Diego Weinstein
, I need to run many procs in parallel. Is there any other way to solve this problem? -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Matt Kettler Sent: Martes, 07 de Octubre de 2003 07:27 p.m. To: Jeffrey Wheat; [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: Re: [SAtalk] 2

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-07 Thread Matt Kettler
At 05:06 PM 10/7/2003, Jeffrey Wheat wrote: I haven't found a real answer in the archives... What is the cause of this error: Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists And is there a solution? The normal cause of that error is two SA processes tryi

RE: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-07 Thread Steven Manross
no one is accessing the bayes DB. Steven -Original Message- From: Jeffrey Wheat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, October 07, 2003 2:06 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors I haven't found a real answer in the archives... What is the cause of this erro

Re: [SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-07 Thread Theo Van Dinter
On Tue, Oct 07, 2003 at 05:06:22PM -0400, Jeffrey Wheat wrote: > What is the cause of this error: > Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File > exists > And is there a solution? It means the lock failed. It's normal with autolearning since you may have mul

[SAtalk] 2.60 lock errors

2003-10-07 Thread Jeffrey Wheat
I haven't found a real answer in the archives... What is the cause of this error: Cannot open bayes databases /etc/mail/spamassassin/bayes_* R/W: lock failed: File exists And is there a solution? Thanks, Jeff --- Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free. Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://