On Fri, Jan 25, 2002 at 12:38:28PM +1100, Justin Mason wrote:
> Freaky:
> >I think maybe we should seperate the rules and the software. People
> >who don't want to sit on the bleeding edge of the Perl may still like to
> >stick to up to date rulesets, and it opens the road up for external apps
>
Duncan Findlay said:
> > - some spamc/spamd command line arg semantics changed (hence the major
> > # change)
> Is the only difference the -f flag as mandatory? I didn't see anything
> else. (I was, however, hoping that spamassassin -P would become standard)
argh, yes, that was intended
At 19:26 23/01/2002 -0500, Duncan Findlay wrote:
>On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:03:18PM +1100, Justin Mason wrote:
> > OK, it's now up there as the new stable version. Here's the change log:
>
>Woohoo!
>
>Unfortunately, I am very busy and won't get around to making the 2.0 Debian
>packages for a fe
On Wed, Jan 23, 2002 at 07:03:18PM +1100, Justin Mason wrote:
> OK, it's now up there as the new stable version. Here's the change log:
Woohoo!
Unfortunately, I am very busy and won't get around to making the 2.0 Debian
packages for a few days. I will do my best.
--
Duncan Findlay
_
Updated RPM files for 2.0 now available on http://www.hughes-family.org/spamassassin
Hopefully these should work better than my half-assed 1.5 packages. I've actually tried to make sure all the docs and programs and libs get into the packages and end up in the right places now. Let me know
