Kris Deugau wrote:
> I'm once again trying to debug some of my rules, and I'm having trouble
> with what *seems* to be a bug in the handling of some types of nested
> multipart MIME messages.
Just to add to the confusion, I've just noticed that the message
received at the support address I answer
I'm once again trying to debug some of my rules, and I'm having trouble
with what *seems* to be a bug in the handling of some types of nested
multipart MIME messages.
A customer reported an untagged pornspam over the weekend. They
forwarded the message as an attachment (attached), so I can see whi
