Re: [SAtalk] 'cryingrussians' spam

2003-06-20 Thread Kai Schaetzl
Kris Deugau wrote on Thu, 19 Jun 2003 17:29:49 -0400: > uri REALLY_SHORT_PORN_01 /cryingrussians.net/i > I just use something like body REALLY_SHORT_PORN_01 /cryingrussians/i Is there any advantage of the first format? F.i. speed? I thought using a body rule might actually help in speed and it

Re: [SAtalk] 'cryingrussians' spam

2003-06-19 Thread Kris Deugau
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I've seen mentions of this type of spam that does not get tagged as such > with the default rules of spamassassin 2.55. > > Can anyone elaborate on techniques for blocking this type of spam? > Any recommendations would be of interest. Start adding global rules- I've fou

[SAtalk] 'cryingrussians' spam

2003-06-17 Thread ree
I've seen mentions of this type of spam that does not get tagged as such with the default rules of spamassassin 2.55. Can anyone elaborate on techniques for blocking this type of spam? I saw mention of the fact that most of these have a forged received header - I checked some that I got here and