Larry,
I would not want to use it because the tagged spam is not actually on a real spam... It's a false positive as the required_hits was set to 2.0 !!! It would not be tagged as spam by my own installation.
Regards,
Stephane
I am not sure, but I think that SA will remove SA markups by de
Hello,
This FAQ entry : http://spamassassin.taint.org/faq/index.cgi?req=show&file=faq04.011.htp
says that all_spam_to will try to find the recipient in any of the following headers:
Resent-To # std, rfc822
Resent-Cc # std, rfc822
To
Apparently-To
Hi,
I have a problem with SpamAssassin where it would get (from postfix) an email sent by someone on the internet, and that email already have a X-Spam-Flag: YES and all the other SpamAssassin headers before I do my own SpamAssassin tests.
How can I remove all SpamAssassin headers (that were add
Theo,
How did you get these useful stats ? Custom made script extracting data out of the
logs ? Maybe you could share part of it so I could run it against my spam holding
mbox. I always love to see stats on anything :)
I am using postfix + procmail + SA 2.50. All spam detected mail is saved
En réponse à Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> On Tue, Feb 25, 2003 at 01:46:19PM +0100, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> wrote:
> > Looking at the bayes db it seems I have more than the 200 messages in
> spam
> > and ham categories required for bayes to kick in, however in the SA
> reports
> > I never se
