Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Thu, Jan 01, 2004 at 09:33:23PM -0500, Mark London wrote:
>Hi - I see the rule USERNAME_IN_SUBJECT, but I've never seen that
triggered at my site, and a test message sent to myself did not trigger
it. We are using spamassassin with sendmail, mimedefang, cy
04 21:27:44 -0500
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
From: Mark London <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: london, you look cute.
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
X-Spam-Level: 0 ()
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.31 (www . roaringpenguin . com / mimedefang)
Theo Van Dinter wrote:
On Wed, Dec 31,
Are suggestions and discussion regarding spamassassin rules discussed here?
The GUARANTEED_100_PERCENT tested should be expanded to phrases like
"100% safe" "100% satisfaction", etc.
Some spam about HGH are getting through, because the HGH are being
spaced out with several non-ascii characters.
I'm sorry if this questioned has been already answered here, but I
couldn't find it using a google search.
I've been using the following configuration for a couple of months:
Mimedefang 2.31 & Spamassassin 2.55
I just received a spam message that has base64 encoded text, and the
spamassassi
I got the following spam message, which has a low rating. The
construction of the To: line is "To: user <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>"I've
seen this in a lot of spam, and can't imagine how a real message sent
to me would have this form, so I would like to create a test for this
situation. Has anyon
Does spamassassin simply total up the scores of all the tests which
are found to be valid for a message, or does it increase the score
based on whether a combination of tests exist? I.e. the likelihood
that a message is spam if it only tests positive for the GUARANTEE
test might only be someth
