I guess we can all start putting together a "habeas corpus"
On Sun, 11 Jan 2004, Jack Gostl wrote:
>
> I must have gotten 20 of these in the last three hours! I'm going to have
> to zap the habeus rule.
>
>
---
This SF.net email is sponsor
I can see how using image references could be problematic... just because
an image is referenced, it doesn't mean the spammer controls it.
Personally, for my home grown additions to the evil list, I've been adding
only the domains or IPs that the spammer wants me to click on... but even
this c
They're all scored at 3.0 -- so a lot depends on where you've set your
spam level. The "original" had a few typoes that have since been
corrected. Before the "big evil" was released, I was using a portion of
the original "evil rules" to filter mail for around 3000 customers. Now
I'm using th
You might look at www.ima.com -- They have Windows and Linux versions of
their servers. I'm using the Linux version for my ISP, and it has some
excellent features for integrating spamassissin and other options
(blacklists, whitelists, authenticated SMTP)
--jenni
On Mon, 10 Nov 2003, Andy Palu
Hello...
I've done a search of the archives and, I saw a post back in May that is
similar to what I'm dealing with. Here's a snippet from the archives:
> Subject: Re: Obfuscating HTML Comment Rule Not Working
> From: Matthew Cline nightrealms.com>
> Date: Sat, 3 May 2003 16:26:30 -0700
> Newsg
