>
>On Tue, 2003-10-07 at 10:55, Frederic Goudal wrote:
>
>> >anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
>>=20
>> I do, it works. Or maybe I don't see the problem.
>
>Among other things, NFS has been known to have file-locking issues. This c=
&
>anybody sharing bayes over NFS, with any issues?
Where could be the problem ?
>I thought i read
>somewhere that somebody was sharing bayes over NFS with a netapp filer
>with no probs.
What is a netapp filer ?
>anybody want to put in their $.02 to bayes over NFS.
I do, it works. Or maybe I
Hello,
Something that I finally don't really understand. If a message has been
recognized as spam, and that it is included as an attachement, do I need to
extract the message before giving it to sa-learn (either as spam or ham ?).
Another point. We have users here that forward their mail throug
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED], Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2003 09:09:10 +0100
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] two subject lines...
>>>
>>>I have a strange behavior with sendmail 8.12.3 spamassassin 4.43 and
>>>spamassassin-milter 0.1.2
The problem is solved with the
Evan Platt <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2003 07:43:47 PST
> Subject: Re: [SAtalk] two subject lines...
>At 06:58 AM 1/14/2003, you wrote:
>
>>Hello,
>>
>>I have a strange behavior with sendmail 8.12.3 spamassassin 4.43 and
>>spamassassin-milter 0.1.2
>>I have configured spamassassin wi
Hello,
I have a strange behavior with sendmail 8.12.3 spamassassin 4.43 and
spamassassin-milter 0.1.2
I have configured spamassassin with a local.cf file containing
spam_level_stars 0
defang_mime 0
rewrite_subject 0
report_header 1
use_terse_report 1
The problem is that spam mail is correctly
> On Friday 13 September 2002 02:47 am, Martin Warnes wrote:
>
> > try:
> >
> > whitelist_from *enseirb.fr
>
> That will let any spam that's forged at from "enseirb.fr" through.
>
Yes but I prefer to have some FP, than having thousands of administrative
mail FN !
I imagine that a solution wo
What I want is that all mail coming from our domain to be accepted.
I have tried to manually white list and it does not work well
I juste now added a rule in 60_whitelist.cf
whitelist_from_rcvd *@enseirb.fr enseirb.r
whitelist_from_rcvd *@*.enseirb.fr
