[SAtalk] Creating rules for the following

.192] by 24.193.45.130 with HTTP => Received =~ /with HTTP/i 2) Subject: ?ISO-8859-1? => Subject =~ /(ISO-8859|iso-8859)/ (score = 3.0) 3) X-Authentication-Warning: iwdwgt vbwss kiyixtg  => exists:X-Authentication-Warning (score 2.75) Are the above correct? Will I bounce legit mail with it? Gar

[SAtalk] Autowhitelist

Title: Autowhitelist Addresses from my mail domain is being saved in the auto-whitelist file. 1) How do I prevent addresses from being auto-whitelisted? 2) How do I delete addresses that are already auto-whitelisted? Gareth Segree mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Technical Support Analyst The

[SAtalk] Ignore SPAM rule for local users

I do not want to check outgoing mail for spam How can I do this is this with SA 2.55 --- This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek Welcome to geek heaven. http://thinkgeek.com/sf ___ Spamassassin-tal

[SAtalk] Error creating user_prefs

Title: Error creating user_prefs I am getting the following error from the spamd daemon when running from exiscan Creating default_prefs [//.spamassassin/user_prefs] Cannot write to //.spamassassin/user_prefs: No such file or directory Where can I change the location that spamassassin is l

[SAtalk] Impotence!!

ge with an extra 2.9 points! Strange thing is, I can't find any reference to impotence in the email, nor the HTML source code. See attached. Gareth Lunchtime Fool <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote .. > This mail is probably spam. The original message has been attached > along w

Re: [SAtalk] Impotence!!

How did I not see that! Would it be wise to sa-learn that message as ham? Thanks Gareth Theo Van Dinter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote .. > The rule hits "erectile dysfunction": > > SEX TIP FOR INVESTORS > Pfizer shareholders all know there's a growing

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn running as cron job

. > If I just go > > ahead and delete the file totally, I get all kinds of errors! > Maybe rm then > > touch? > > Get rid of the "echo": > > > /var/spool/mail/spam > > /var/spool/mail/ham > > should do the trick. > Great! That works..

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn running as cron job

against the normal non-spam > mail. Shouldn't all the ham have already passed through spamassassin and > be "learned". > I only run this against mail that SpamAssassin has incorrectly identified; spam identified as ham, and ham identifed as spam. Gareth -

[SAtalk] sa-learn running as cron job

added the cron job... again, sounds ridiculous, but I can't see what else has changed! Anyone else experienced this? Thanks Gareth Oxfordshire, UK --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET sites including Data

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn running as cron job

ty the mbox file? /usr/bin/sa-learn --spam --mbox /var/spool/mail/spam echo > /var/spool/mail/spam /usr/bin/sa-learn --ham --mbox /var/spool/mail/ham echo > /var/spool/mail/ham That doesn't completely empty the file, it makes it 1 byte If I just go ahead and delete the file

RE: [SAtalk] sa-learn running as cron job

pam --mbox /var/spool/mail/spam ...and it works! Thanks I didn't think that would be necessary, given that I'm specifying mbox as a parameter... Many thanks Gareth --- This SF.Net email sponsored by: Free pre-built ASP.NET si

RE: [SAtalk] Spamd won't start

do a spamd without the -d (daemonise) option and see what error is returned. -Original Message- From: Mike Burkhouse [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, January 15, 2003 02:57 PM To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subject: [SAtalk] Spamd won't start Hi everyone. I just subscribed to this li

RE: [SAtalk] spamd with -u not working with exim

Ok! guys I figured it out I did a spamd -L -S -i 0.0.0.0 -x -D -u mail and the following error message was returned fatal: Can't create /tmp/spamassassin-24759 at /usr/bin/spamd line 209. the permissions on /tmp was drwxrwx--t --- This SF.NET e

RE: [SAtalk] spamd with -u not working with exim

I used the default port. but the main fact is that the daemon isnt running. Do you have any clues? -Original Message- From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Tuesday, January 14, 2003 03:48 PM To: Segree, Gareth Cc: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: Re: [SAtalk] spa

[SAtalk] spamd with -u not working with exim

spamd has to have a higher user id Gareth Segree Technical Support Analyst (876)922-3400 Ext. 6345 Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: FREE SSL Guide from Thawte are you planning your Web Server Security? Click here

[SAtalk] spamd with -u not working

I have upgraded from SA 2.41 to 2.43 but when I run spamd it fails spamd -d -L -i 0.0.0.0 -x -u mail if I remove the -u it defaults to nobody spamd -d -L -i 0.0.0.0 -x -D the mail user exists using id 8 is it that spamd has to have a higher user id Gareth Segree Technical Support Analyst (876