On Mon, 26 Jan 2004 07:26:29 -0500
Thomas Bolioli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Anyone seen this? NB:The From, Subject and Sender headers...
> I googled for the name (as a phrase) and came up with less then 2 pages
> of results and only one email address tagged to the name. Who knows if
> it is h
On Mon, 01 Dec 2003 22:20:42 -0800
Kenneth Porter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Granted, that first one can be tricky if you don't RTFM. i'm pretty sure
> > even the SpamAssassin RPM includes readme files. not sure where they are?
rpm has many nifty features. One of them is the list option, wh
Hi all
The InfoWorld article has just hit Slashdot (http://www.slashdot.org/)
Good vehicle to reverse the bad publicity methinks.
Ciao
Zak
--
http://www.carfolio.com/Searchable database of 10 000+ car specs
Auctio
Hi all
Is there a rule implemented that checks for this? Many spams have subject lines
of the form:
"Ha1f Off Perscript1on Meds... [ mk"
"Your Very Own 'Life Soundtrack' VYiaBuvv"
"Re: Hydrocodoneb2cbr333"
etc etc.
I find that in practice
On Wed, 15 Oct 2003 22:42:36 -0400
Larry Gilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I really like RPM also. I have made almost all of my packages including
> Razor2 agents and DCC (dccproc). I grab trusted src RPMs for Postfix and SA
> (thanks Theo) and --rebuild them on specific machines.
1 word (for
Hi all
I have 2 odd issues which don't seem to be mentioned in the FAQs.
1 - when a user sets return receipt notification on, an odd-looking almost blank
message is returned to him from SA. Do I need to upgrade to the latest version?
Is this expected behaviour? Is it possible to stop this from ha