[SAtalk] [Fwd: FWD: national opt-out directory]

2003-06-28 Thread Warren Togami
Hmm, am I correct in assuming this is a clever new spam trying to pretend it is related to the US government's donotcall.gov? Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- Begin Message --- Title: Remove.Org This is worth checking out... please pass it on. - Original Message - From:

Re: [SAtalk] updated PR1 builds

2003-06-24 Thread Warren Togami
On Tue, 2003-06-24 at 16:16, Justin Mason wrote: > I've just rebuilt these, as the distributed ones didn't have > up-to-date Changes lists. These ones now do. No code or rule > changes, so if you've already got the others, don't worry about it. > > md5sums: > > a7898286e2dc9f6102aecedbfe6c818

[SAtalk] Razor packages for Red Hat

2003-06-22 Thread Warren Togami
these packages. They seem to work great, I personally am using them with spamassassin-2.55 on several mail servers. (Now the only spamassassin enhancing thing that Fedora does not yet have packaged is dccproc. We could use your assistance if you have packaged dccproc before.) Warren Togami [EMAIL

[SAtalk] pyzor package for Red Hat

2003-06-21 Thread Warren Togami
https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=360 pyzor package for Red Hat, cleaned up a bit. I would appreciate any suggestions for improving this package further. Has anyone made a package of dccproc for Red Hat that builds cleanly as a non-root user? Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED

Re: [SAtalk] DNSBL MTA rejection and more efficiency?

2003-06-19 Thread Warren Togami
open relays are spam... ;-) > > And some of the other lists (spews ?) actually make a *point* of > deliberately causing collateral damage to try and put pressure on spam > hosting ISP's, but as always, it is the innocent parties who are > disadva

[SAtalk] DNSBL MTA rejection and more efficiency?

2003-06-19 Thread Warren Togami
CPU and disk resources and run more efficiently, if everything from the SBL is indeed spam. If the SBL is generally safe to use for MTA-level rejection, are any of the other DNSBL's safe to use in this way too? Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] -

Re: [SAtalk] Re: spamassassin Bugzilla Bug 2027: spamassassin -rdoes "learning ham" instead of "learning spam" ?

2003-06-19 Thread Warren Togami
;s no message-id in > those messages, but ... Could SA release 2.56 with this and possibly other bug fixes? This particular bug is very serious to me. How far off is 2.60? Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is spo

Re: [SAtalk] Everyone running PYZOR read

2003-06-17 Thread Warren Togami
will fix it for all my users. rm -f /home/*/.pyzor/servers On the subject of pyzor, if you are anonymous are you still able to report? Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.Net email is sponsored by: INetU Attention Web Developers &am

Re: [SAtalk] RH 9.0 & Spamassassin 2.55

2003-06-17 Thread Warren Togami
i?id=374 perl-MailTools (needed by Razor) https://bugzilla.fedora.us/show_bug.cgi?id=376 perl-Digest-Nilsimsa (needed by Razor) My dcc package is currently in poor shape and nowhere near release quality. Has anyone else made RH compatible dcc RPMS before? I could use more examples of .spe

[SAtalk] spamassassin -r Questions

2003-06-16 Thread Warren Togami
-> report failed: Received error code 256 at /usr/lib/perl5/vendor_perl/5.8.0/Mail/SpamAssassin/Reporter.pm line 326. Thanks, Warren Togami [EMAIL PROTECTED] --- This SF.NET email is sponsored by: eBay Great deals on office technology -- on eBay no