Re: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

- Original Message - From: "Kenneth Porter" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, December 05, 2003 5:52 AM Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA > --On Monday, December 01, 2003 3:55 PM -0600 Rich Puhek > <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Here's the

Re: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

- Original Message - From: "Mark Muller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "'Obantec Support'" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Monday, December 01, 2003 9:27 PM Subject: RE: [SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

[SAtalk] Disable a User who does not want SA

Hi All RH8.0 with SA2.60 installed as sitewide. Procmailrc is handling spam for all users and creates ~/.spamassassin/user_prefs ok. Now 1 customer has decided he does not like spam filtered emails (cannot please all). tried |/usr/bin/spamassasin -x in procmailrc since i read no user_prefs no s

Re: [SAtalk] evilrules.cf including in local.cf?

even the local.cf.sample? Or just the files that end in .cf? Probably a rhetorical question... I didn't know all the cf's would get processed. Good tip. Rudy Matt Kettler wrote: At 02:37 PM 10/15/2003, Mike Schrauder wrote: I have sa/spamd setup on postfix - debian using Duncan Findlay's de

[SAtalk] reasons for these false positives

Hi, I'm getting a false positive on an automated mailing list. The reasons are listed below. Is there a place where I can get a run-down on what these tests test? For example, the Date doesn't seem to be 6-12 hours before the Received: dates; it looks OK to me. And what does it mean by From: d

[SAtalk] asian fonts induce false negatives?

Hi, I have a user who gets SPAM with scores of around -6.0 points. One thing I've noticed is that they have asian characters(and some english). Could this be inducing a false negative? Also one side question. how exactly is a negative score accumulated? Are there negative points added to the

RE: [SAtalk] Stop using Bayes(site-wide)

Sorry I meant SA 2.53. doesn't setting "use_bayes 0" mean "don't enable bayes" and yes they do come back. thanx, -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Theo Van Dinter Sent: Wednesday, May 28, 2003 1:53 PM To

[SAtalk] Stop using Bayes(site-wide)

Hi, How can I completely stop SA 2.43 from using bayes? my /etc/mail/spamassassin/local.cf has this. - # Enable the Bayes system use_bayes 0 # Enable Bayes auto-learning auto_learn 0 # Enable or disable network checks skip_rbl_checks

RE: [SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

Thanx for the FAQ David, that makes things far more clear ''Hi, Support! My, what an interesting name you have. Were your parents athletic?'' Ha, Ha, Actually, Im just using the support@iquest email so if(when) I leave here, my heir can use the same list. I tried to gr

[SAtalk] How SpamAssassin works & load testing

Hi, I have mailscanner and spamassassin installed on a RH7.2 box. Let me get his straight...when new mail comes into the mailserver spamassassin tries to check whether or not it is spam by looking it's name/characteristics up on an online database somewhere or does it have a local database that

[SAtalk] [Fwd: Seminar: Secrets of SPAM]

  H... Here's something interesting.   I forward this so that perhaps a few hundred people in the US and Canada will call the 800 number a couple dozen times and make this a little more expesive for the worthless losers holding this.  I like costing spammers money ;^).   Don Origin