[SAtalk] Another SA upgrader question

2002-10-08 Thread Steve Yuroff
I currently have 2.11 installed and running fine, and am ready to move to 2.42. I'll be using the CPAN intaller, and have 2 simple questions: Is it "acceptable" to just run the CPAN install command while my mail server is up and running, and probably going to invoke SA to run during the upgrad

RE: [SAtalk] Newbie help-RH7.2+Postfix

2002-10-02 Thread Steve Yuroff
>The easiest way to install SA would be to run: > >perl -MCPAN -e 'install Mail::SpamAssassin' > >and answer yes to any questions about following dependencies. Once that's >done, type: > >man Mail::SpamAssassin::Conf > >and you'll get most of what you need to know to configure SA. > >HTH, >St- >

Re: [SAtalk] Deploying SA sitewide

2002-04-29 Thread Steve Yuroff
d in the background," part of the instructions. It's written with the assumption I know how to do that, but I don't, yet. Regards, Steve. >Steve Yuroff wrote: > >SY> Date: 29 Apr 2002 16:18:57 -0500 >SY> From: Steve Yuroff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >SY

[SAtalk] Deploying SA sitewide

2002-04-29 Thread Steve Yuroff
Hi List, I'm new at this type of thing, so bear with me. I recently installed SA and .procmailrc files for 4 users at my small company, and it's working well- so well that it's time to let everyone benefit from this magic tool. But before I do that, I have 2 things I have to understand: 1)

[SAtalk] Global SA Statistics?

2002-04-17 Thread Steve Yuroff
Hi folks, Does SA keep stats on what it's doing? IE- 73 of the last 100 messages were flagged as spam, average score=5.3. Processed 300 messages in the last 24 hours stuff like that. How might I go about getting this info from it? -- Steve Yuroff Network and System Administrato

[SAtalk] SA install on a Qube 3

2002-04-09 Thread Steve Yuroff
n-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Received: from 192.168.6.183 (millivanilli.hiebing.com [192.168.6.183] (may be forged)) by mail.hiebing.com (8.10.2/8.10.2) with ESMTP id g39I5bp04572 for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 9 Apr 2002 13:05:37 -0500 Date: 09 Apr 2002 13:05:42 -0500 Message-ID: <