RE: [SAtalk] Spamd problems with big loads

2003-10-09 Thread Steve Halligan
> I'm using SA 2.6 spamd/spamc > > I'm using it in a very loaded server, I get arround 2 mail connections > per second. > I want to know if there are people having this kind of load, or even > bigger, cause I don't think this should be a big load for the server. > > The server is Pentium III 1 g

RE: [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s)

2003-06-27 Thread Steve Halligan
Let me rephrase that. Stop sending virus warning to the recipients. Especially non-local recipients. Especially if the recipient is a list. > People, please configure your virus scanners not to reply to > the sender. > Most viri these days are spoofing the sender anyway. > -steve > > > Incident

RE: [SAtalk] Report to Recipient(s)

2003-06-27 Thread Steve Halligan
People, please configure your virus scanners not to reply to the sender. Most viri these days are spoofing the sender anyway. -steve > Incident Information:- > > Originator: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Recipients: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject:Spamassassin-talk digest, Vol 1 #1321 - 28 msgs > > WARNIN

[SAtalk] Modified spamcheck.py for use on a Postfix gateway MTA

2002-11-07 Thread Steve Halligan
27; I hope that this is helpful. -Original Message- From: James Sizemore [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2002 2:44 AM To: Steve Halligan Subject: Re: [SAtalk] There has to be a way. That would be great. Steve Halligan wrote: I have a changed spamcheck.py pyt

[SAtalk] Postfix as an MTA with SA -- forwarding spam

2002-09-23 Thread Steve Halligan
I am running Postfix as a gateway MTA (no local delivery) and am using SA to mark spam as it passes through. I am familar with postfixes ability to reject mail based on header content, so I know I could look for "X-SPAM: Yes" and reject. But I don't want to outright reject it. I would rather for