[SAtalk] skip attachment scanning?

2004-01-13 Thread Stenglein, James C
Quick question for the list…   Our users receive a lot of .doc attachments that seem to be caught with various rules such as backhair.  We have no intention of removing the backhair tests though.  Anyone know of a simple way to skip attachment scanning or at least what test to use to nega

RE: [SAtalk] (no subject)

2003-12-04 Thread Stenglein, James C
>>I just got this virus message that appears to have come from sourceforge. >>Did anyone else get this or did my antivirus FP on me? >FP.. that exact message passed through my copy of clamscan just fine.. >clamav is updated hourly here. We had it hit as a virus also... James -

RE: [SAtalk] Can you customize the body of a spam message

2003-11-04 Thread Stenglein, James C
/usr/share/spamassassin/10_misc.cf contains that infobut it will get overwritten if/when you upgrade versions. James Stenglein -Original Message- From: Paul Hirschorn [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Tuesday, November 04, 2003 3:10 PM To: '[EMAIL PROTECTED]' Subject: [SAtalk] Can you

[SAtalk] "no subject" not being prepended?

2003-10-15 Thread Stenglein, James C
First off...Spamassassin rules.  One little issue though...   Has anyone run into an problem where spamassassin is catching the spam and trying to prepend the *SPAM* but it fails when there is no subject line?  We are using SA2.60/sendmail 8.12.10/spamass-milter on redhat 9 as a g

RE: [SAtalk] Appliances vs SA

2003-08-22 Thread Stenglein, James C
On Wednesday, August 20, 2003, at 02:09 PM, K Old wrote: > Hello everyone, > > I've been using SA for at least a year or two now and love it! We > combine it with MailScanner with ClamAV and out of 20,000 emails per > week receive no viruses and block out around 4,000 pieces of > spam.and r