anks a lot.
Regards,
Somik
- Original Message -
From: "Donald L. Greer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Somik Raha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 03, 2003 1:25 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Blocking spam from High Speed Media (v
> Or just add
>
> sendfree.com REJECT
> hi-speedmail REJECT
>
> to /etc/mail/access
That didn't work . Though, Procmail filters set on the Reply-to field did
the job. These folks have a pattern in their reply-to message.
Regards,
Somik
---
Th
n Procmail filters for the Reply-To address, and
I think that should work, but I was hoping to find a solution by tweaking
Spamassassin.
Regards,
Somik
- Original Message -
From: "Hamish Marson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Somik Raha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <
Hi,
I went thru some of the earlier messages titled "Increase in low scoring
spam", but I wasn't able to figure out what I could do in version 2.43 to
block mails from High Speed Media (I'm still new to SA).
Hamish Marson had posted these checks :
/^From: .*@sendfree\.com/ REJECT Blo
Hi Theo,
I just upgraded to v2.43 (I was using an older version that I picked up
from redhat.com), and this one works fine.
Thanks a lot.
Regards,
Somik
- Original Message -
From: "Somik Raha" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Theo Van Dinter" <[EMAIL PROT
Hi Theo,
>> :0:
>> * ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
>>
>> spam
>You can't have a blank line there. And none of the other SA-related
> rules will run since it's caught here.
Sorry, that was actually a typo on my part. There is no blank line in the
file.
>This isn't a complete rule.
>You may also want to
Hi,
I was trying to configure
spam-assassin with procmail, and I find that although spamassassin marks the
spam mails correctly with SPAM in the subject line, procmail is not moving it
correctly to the spam folder - it continues to be in the inbox. Here's my
procmail recipe :
MAILDIR=/
