RE: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7)

2002-03-07 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 What you need to do is just turn off/lower the score of those tests if you don't like them. That message wouldn't have even gotten through to my server, as I reject mail from the sites in those blacklists. Those tests mean that the server administra

RE: [SAtalk] A signed message

2002-03-04 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weird, for some reason my PGP said your signature was bad on that message. Here's one signed by me! :) - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Leffler Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:51 PM To:

RE: [SAtalk] 2.11 released

2002-03-04 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Personally, I love the PGP signature bonus, and I think that should stay relatively high. I've never seen a piece of Spam with a PGP signature, and I use them quite a bit myself, as do many other IT folks. I don't think that Spammers are going to go

RE: [SAtalk] problems with SpamAssassin's Razor-integration

2002-02-27 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 I'm having the exact same problem with Razor, I decided to download and install it this morning before installing the 2.1 release of SpamAssassin, but Razor::Client doesn't appear to exist. I used the 1.20 release of Razor, if you're curious. I trie

RE: [SAtalk] False positive on FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD test

2002-02-21 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yep, I've noticed it flagging a lot of e-mails from friends that have legitimate hotmail accounts as well. That's on 2.0 on my Red Hat Linux box. Seth Bokelman PC Support Specialist College of Social & Behavioral Sciences University of Northern Iowa