Re: [SAtalk] Email Not Caught

2004-01-07 Thread Seth
These are the rules that it flagged on my 2.60 installation: HTML_MESSAGE MIME_BASE64_LATIN MIME_BASE64_TEXT Seth On Wed, 2004-01-07 at 10:21, Mike Carlson wrote: > I have a message that is not getting caught by the spam filter. In > fact it scores 0.0 if I look at the header. Why wou

Re: [SAtalk] Spamhaus XBL list

2004-01-05 Thread Seth
k List tflags RCVD_IN_XBL net score RCVD_IN_XBL 1 It appears to be working properly. Seth McClain On Mon, 2004-01-05 at 10:55, Andy Donovan wrote: > Does anyone have a snippet of code on how to include the following in SA checks > thanks > > http://www.spamhaus.org/xbl/

Re: [SAtalk] OT: AI spam filter

2004-01-02 Thread Hanford, Seth
NOTE: I read the Corvigo whitepaper, but I don't know ANYTHING about their product. This statement is based entirely upon what I have assumed after reading this single document. > Essentially AI interpretation of the meaning (or intent as they put it) > of language in order to identify spam. >

[SAtalk] HELP

2003-08-07 Thread Seth Berger
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 08/07/03 02:30PM >>>Send Spamassassin-talk mailing list submissions to    [EMAIL PROTECTED]To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit    https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/spamassassin-talkor, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help

RE: [SAtalk] false positives since upgrading to 2.11 (1/7)

2002-03-07 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
o clean up their act. Their users will thank you too, as I'm guessing they send a lot of messages out that don't get delivered, as there are a LOT of sysadmins that reject mail from sites in the RBLs. Seth Bokelman PC Support Specialist College of Social & Behavioral Sc

RE: [SAtalk] A signed message

2002-03-04 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Weird, for some reason my PGP said your signature was bad on that message. Here's one signed by me! :) - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On Behalf Of Greg Leffler Sent: Monday, March 04, 2002 9:51 PM To:

[SAtalk] FAQ Suggestion

2002-03-04 Thread Seth Arnold
Greetings! Spamassassin is cool; thanks! In the few days its been installed for me, my spam has gone down quite a bit. Nice. A quick thought about the FAQ[1]: In the bit about "How do I report a spam to Razor?" it would be nice to mention that spamassassin -d strips the headers and inline modifi

RE: [SAtalk] 2.11 released

2002-03-04 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
e going to go through all the trouble of obtaining a PGP key and signing their messages just to slip one past SpamAssassin. Seth Bokelman PC Support Specialist College of Social & Behavioral Sciences University of Northern Iowa - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[E

RE: [SAtalk] problems with SpamAssassin's Razor-integration

2002-02-27 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
/usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl/5.6.1 /usr/local/lib/perl5/site_perl .). BEGIN failed--compilation aborted. Seth Bokelman PC Support Specialist College of Social & Behavioral Sciences University of Northern Iowa - -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] On

RE: [SAtalk] False positive on FORGED_HOTMAIL_RCVD test

2002-02-21 Thread Seth H. Bokelman
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 Yep, I've noticed it flagging a lot of e-mails from friends that have legitimate hotmail accounts as well. That's on 2.0 on my Red Hat Linux box. Seth Bokelman PC Support Specialist College of Social & Behavioral Sciences Universi