Bart Schaefer wrote:
On Mon, 29 Sep 2003, Jack Gostl wrote:
That new Bayes algorithm is mighty touchy. So far its tagged four real
messages with a BAYES_99, three of them today alone. In just five days
it has had twice the false positives that 2.55 had in four months.
I noticed similar be
MailScanner has built-in filetype and file extension filters. It also
supports multiple anti-virus engines and uses SpamAssassin for spam
protection
Best of all, it's easy to set up!
www.mailscanner.info
Ryan
Bob Apthorpe wrote:
Hi,
On Mon, 01 Sep 2003 14:19:32 +0530 "BG Mahesh" <[EMAIL PR
Did anyone ever figure out a fix for this on Exchange 2000? It will be a
while before I can migrate to 2003.
To recap: the problem involves retrieving intact headers from messages
moved to Public Folders on Exchange 2000.
Thanks,
Ryan
-Original Message-
From: Covington, Chris [mailto:
Tom Meunier wrote:
I don't know how you're doing this, but my Ham and Spam public folders work exactly as specified. Are you certain your users aren't forwarding them there, but rather dragging & dropping from Outlook? Are your users connecting to the server via IMAP or MAPI? (We don't use IMAP
Covington, Chris wrote:
Ryan,
I've found that if mail is sent directly to a mail-enabled Public
Folder's email address, IE from amavisd-new or Postfix, its headers will
make it through with IMAP. However, if an email is moved to or from a
Public Folder with Outlook (regardless of whether or not
Tony Hoyle wrote:
Try in OutlookSpy... if you view the Imessage and look for PR_INTERNET_CONTENT that
will contain the exact text of the original message. If PR_INTERNET_CONTENT is
missing the
original message is lost.
If that attribute is there it should be relatively trivial to write an app wh
Oh the Irony!
- Original Message -
From: "Justin Mason" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 11, 2003 7:14 PM
Subject: [SAtalk] spam filtering friendly fire
Theo dropped us a line last night to note that sourceforge.net's spam
filters are blocking his mail fo
Dang! You upgraded to Titanium? Just like that?
- Original Message -
From: "Covington, Chris" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Ryan Bingham" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Tom Meunier"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; "Martin Bene" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Tony Hoyle wrote:
If you can write some software to fetch it, the original text of the email is stored
in exchange 2000 (not 5.5, which always reconstructs the text from its MAPI
information).
I had a play with it and you can retrieve the original email in a lot of cases, but
in (seemingly random
I second the recommendation for MailScanner. We use it
in conjunction with Sophos here (with great results), and MailScanner
can use any number of anti-virus engines -- including clamAV -- and can
use multiple scan engines at the same time. It also integrates with
SpamAssassin and has a host of
My recommendation would be to use MailScanner (http://www.mailscanner.info)
to call SpamAssassin, and then use MailWatch for MailScanner
(http://www.smf.f2s.com/mailscanner/) to generate your reports (it
conveniently logs all MailScanner traffic to a MySQL database).
MailScanner is very easy to in
I apologize to anyone if this has been brought up
before, but I'd be curious to get some opinions on the concept of "greylisting"
as a spamfighting tool. To summarize, it involves initially rejecting an
SMTP session from an unknown source in the expection that a valid SMTP host will
try aga
Haha. I love how these threads evolve. SCO dropped out of this
conversation like after the first post.
Now, QED, SCO violated GNU!
Excellent.
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: "Stuart Gall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Greg A" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>;
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 12
Didn't this (and all the subsequent flames) just happen? Like several times
already in the recent past??
Anyone ever see Groundhog Day? I'm startin to get wigged out...
Ryan
- Original Message -
From: Marge Golomb
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, June 03, 2003 9:17 PM
Subject: [SA
14 matches
Mail list logo
