n the body of SA's output mail?
Thanks in advance for any answer to this question,
Robert Kehl
---
This sf.net email is sponsored by:ThinkGeek
Welcome to geek heaven.
http://thinkgeek.com/sf
__
ould get the impression that SA does the job. SA
still flags the mail only, but the MTA reacts in the same session and
quite immediatly, that's all.
You may substitue the term 'exim' with one of 'postfix', 'sendmail',
'Qmail', 'smail' and the
- Original Message -
From: "Klaus Mueller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, September 17, 2003 6:14 PM
Subject: Re: [SAtalk] Test rule in spamassassin blocks my domains
> Kristoffersen wrote:
> >
> > As you can see kristOFFERSen.us/.no would match this rule.
>
h the VeriScam IP address
> (64.94.110.11), then you know it is a bogus e-mail from a fake domain.
>
>From the exim user's mailing list - there are some more bad guys out
there than just the ones from verisign...
Sorry if this might have appeared earlier on this list.
Regards,
Robert K
