he?
what's going on here?!?
repeat after me: "spamassassin is no virusscanner!"
virusscanners need to be able to scan attachments, and this is a thing
that SA can't do.
have a look here
http://www.ijs.si/software/amavisd/
and please stop trying to abuse our spam murdering little ninja, ok? :D
same here.
Tim B wrote:
did I get booted off the list, no list traffic or is sourceforge down?
I haven't gotten anything really since friday
---
The SF.Net email is sponsored by EclipseCon 2004
Premiere Conference on Open Tools Developme
you probalby don't really want to run it with sendmail but with
procmail. which is the easiest and fastest way.
but if you really want to then i suggest running sendmail with "amavisd
new" (www.amavis.org) which has virus scanning and/or attachment
blocking as well.
have a look at this howto:
Scott Lambert wrote:
On Tue, Jan 20, 2004 at 07:35:04AM +0100, Claude Frantz wrote:
"John A. Hengstler" wrote:
I have noticed this as well.
I am using spamd on a separate server, and local.cf on that server
is ignored. I can put rules into /usr/local/share/spamassasin and
the pull in
Hi Jürgen!
you need some rules for SA which can detect obfuscated spellings of
those keywords like vagira, cilais a.s.o.
heres a sample rule i normally use for such words
body MY_OBF1
/((?!*censored*)(?:(?:[EMAIL PROTECTED]|@])|(?:v\W*[i|1]\W*[a|@]\W*g\W*r\W*[a|@])))/i
describe MY_OBF1 body: cont
if "export LANG=de" doesnt work try
"export [EMAIL PROTECTED]"
regards
ralf
Christopher Kunz wrote:
Hi,
just a quick question: How do I enable localized rule descriptions?
There's a lot of german rule descriptions in the stock SA distribution,
but they're not used on my (german) mail server se
Matt Kettler wrote:
At 09:02 PM 1/19/04 +0100, Anders Sveen wrote:
I'm actually listed because it originates from a dynamic ip-range.
Nothing more. It surprises me that they lists ip's for only beeing
dynamic, but then I discovered the way RBLs are being used by
mailservers and then it actually
in case you have SA 2.6x
then just type "sa-learn --dump magic"
Adrian Simmons wrote:
Is there an easy way to get a total of the spam/ham in the bayes db?
I've noticed the total come up in the log when running SA in debug mode,
and one could probably dump the db and go hunting for the magic num
