Hello,
> Pierre Bacquet wrote:
>
> > Hello fellow spam fighters,
>
> SA version?
>
> S*ll* *d**t
What's that ?? I was reporting what seemed to be a new technique
and I wasn't requesting any help to tweak my rules. Thus asking
me what is my SA version is not v
Hello fellow spam fighters,
I don't know if it has already been signalled, but this is a trick I have
seen in one
SPAM that I've got :
We were aware of one technique which is beaking some words (well known by
filters) using
HTML comments. I've found such technique that uses a different trick :
P
Hello,
I've noticed something strange with SA :
* I run SA release "one inch in centimeters" (i.e. 2.54).
* I've received a spam which has hot a score of 3.3 (see at the end of the
mail)
* I pass it through the Bayesian classifier using :
% sa-learn --spam --file ./SpamMsg.txt
I expect this
Hello,
I am receiving a lot of SPAM for HGH for whatever including the
following recurring sentences :
As seen on NBC, CBS, and even Oprah ...
As reported on in the New England Journal of Medicine ...
Nowadays these spams or others include HTML random comments such as
.
These SPAM are rated un
