Hello,
* Frank Bures <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [22.07.02 20:07]:
> could please anyone point me to instructions how to install SpamAssassin on
> IRIX 6.5, specifically the spamd and spamc.
Hm, you do not need any special information, just build spamassassin the
normal way:
[unzip/untar the archive]
Hello,
* Philipp Grau <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 07:10]:
> * Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 06:18]:
> > The only other thing I can think of offhand is, does the procmail process
> > perhaps have its resource limits set smaller than the interactive she
Hello,
* Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [16.06.02 06:18]:
> The only other thing I can think of offhand is, does the procmail process
> perhaps have its resource limits set smaller than the interactive shell?
Well, if I use spamc/spamd it works well, so you are probably right. So I
will do
Hello,
* Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [15.06.02 20:09]:
> Let's see the procmail rule. It might be procmail that's running out of
> memory -- there is a known allocation bug in procmail 3.22.
Ok. here we go:
,[ /home/phgrau/.procmailrc ]
| MAILDIR=/home/phgrau/Mail
| LOGFILE=$MAILDIR
cis.fu-berlin.de!phgrau Sat Jun 15 15:58:13 2002
| Subject: MAKE MONEY AT HOME $20+ PER YEAR
| Folder: /var/mail/phgrau 3669
`
As you see SA starts and then produces/gets an out of memory...
If you have seen this problem before, or have any s
Hello
* Bart Schaefer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [30.05.02 18:47]:
> For the record, this *might* be fixed in
> ftp://ftp.procmail.net/pub/procmail/testing/snapshot.tar.gz
> I've never seen the problem myself, but I'd be interested to hear whether
> anyone who is seeing it has better luck with th
pamassassin but were not
or they haven't got an X-Spam-Status: or X-Spam-Level:.
Is this a perfocmance issue, or locking problems. How to debug this problem?
Any hints are welcome.
Philipp Grau
___
Have big pipes? SourceForge.ne
